There’s a growing tension in transportation litigation right now: federal law says one thing, courts are interpreting another, and companies are left operating in the gray.
This month’s edition takes a closer look at where that tension is playing out, and what it means in practice. Our featured article covers the U.S. Supreme Court’s review of broker liability in Montgomery v. Caribe, a case that could redefine the scope of federal preemption and reshape how brokers evaluate risk across their networks.
At the same time, recent decisions across Texas, Maryland, and New Jersey reinforce a consistent theme: ownership alone isn’t enough, contracts matter, and control still drives liability, but only when the facts support it.
The takeaway is straightforward: how relationships are structured, documented, and executed is becoming just as important as how accidents happen.