In transportation litigation, exposure is increasingly shaped by how courts define responsibility, not just by how an accident occurs.
This month’s edition looks at how courts are continuing to redraw those lines. Our featured article examines how routine accidents can evolve into high-exposure litigation in New York, particularly where “serious injury” claims and medical narratives take center stage.
Recent decisions across Indiana, Utah, and Pennsylvania reinforce just how fluid liability boundaries have become: from limiting direct negligence claims once agency is admitted, to allowing broader duty theories despite federal compliance, to reclassifying a logistics provider as a carrier based on how it operated and held itself out.
The throughline is clear, labels alone won’t control the outcome. How relationships are structured, how responsibilities are defined, and how claims are developed will continue to drive exposure.